Current:Home > ContactRussia’s Supreme Court effectively outlaws LGBTQ+ activism in a landmark ruling -FutureFinance
Russia’s Supreme Court effectively outlaws LGBTQ+ activism in a landmark ruling
View
Date:2025-04-14 15:07:42
TALLINN, Estonia (AP) — Russia’s Supreme Court on Thursday effectively outlawed LGBTQ+ activism, in the most drastic step against advocates of gay, lesbian and transgender rights in the increasingly conservative country.
In a statement announcing a lawsuit filed to the court earlier this month, the Justice Ministry argued that authorities had identified “signs and manifestations of an extremist nature” by an LGBTQ+ “movement” operating in Russia, including “incitement of social and religious discord,” although it offered no details or evidence. In its ruling, the court declared the “movement” to be extremist and banned it in Russia.
The hearing took place behind closed doors and with no defendant. Multiple rights activists have pointed out that the lawsuit targeted the “international civic LGBT movement,” which is not an entity but rather a broad and vague definition that would allow Russian authorities to crack down on any individuals or groups deemed to be part of the “movement.”
“Despite the fact that the Justice Ministry demands to label a nonexistent organization -- ‘the international civic LGBT movement’ -- extremist, in practice it could happen that the Russian authorities, with this court ruling at hand, will enforce it against LGBTQ+ initiatives that work in Russia, considering them a part of this civic movement,” Max Olenichev, a human rights lawyer who works with the Russian LGBTQ+ community, told The Associated Press ahead of the hearing.
Some LGBTQ+ activists have said they sought to become a party to the lawsuit, arguing that it concerns their rights, but were rejected by the court. The Justice Ministry has not responded to a request for comment on the lawsuit.
The Supreme Court ruling is the latest step in a decadelong crackdown on LGBTQ+ rights in Russia begun under President Vladimir Putin, who has put “traditional family values” at the cornerstone of his rule.
In 2013, the Kremlin adopted the first legislation restricting LGBTQ+ rights, known as the “gay propaganda” law, banning any public endorsement of “nontraditional sexual relations” among minors. In 2020, constitutional reforms pushed through by Putin to extend his rule by two more terms also included a provision to outlaw same-sex marriage.
After sending troops into Ukraine in 2022, the Kremlin ramped up its comments about protecting “traditional values” from what it called the West’s “degrading” influence, in what rights advocates saw as an attempt to legitimize the war. That same year, the authorities adopted a law banning propaganda of “nontraditional sexual relations” among adults, also, effectively outlawing any public endorsement of LGBTQ+ people.
Another law passed earlier this year prohibited gender transitioning procedures and gender-affirming care for transgender people. The legislation prohibited any “medical interventions aimed at changing the sex of a person,” as well as changing one’s gender in official documents and public records. It also amended Russia’s Family Code by listing gender change as a reason to annul a marriage and adding those “who had changed gender” to a list of people who can’t become foster or adoptive parents.
“Do we really want to have here, in our country, in Russia, ‘Parent No. 1, No. 2, No. 3’ instead of ‘mom’ and ‘dad?’” Putin said in September 2022. “Do we really want perversions that lead to degradation and extinction to be imposed in our schools from the primary grades?”
Authorities have rejected accusations of discrimination against LGBTQ+ people. Earlier this month, Russian media quoted Andrei Loginov, a deputy justice minister, as saying that “the rights of LGBT people in Russia are protected” legally. Loginov spoke in Geneva, while presenting a report on human rights in Russia to the U.N. Human Rights Council, and argued that “restraining public demonstration of non-traditional sexual relationships or preferences is not a form of censure for them.”
veryGood! (29516)
Related
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- Boxer Ryan Garcia misses weight for Saturday fight, loses $1.5 million bet to Devin Haney
- NBA playoff games today: How to watch, predictions for Game 1s on Saturday
- Who will win the NBA Finals? Predictions for 2024 NBA playoffs bracket
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- Former champion Jinder Mahal leaves WWE, other stars surprisingly released on Friday
- We're Making a Splash With This Aquamarine Cast Check In
- Brittney Spencer celebrates Beyoncé collaboration with Blackbird tattoo
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- Taylor Swift’s New PDA Video With Travis Kelce Puts Their Alchemy on Display
Ranking
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- This week on Sunday Morning (April 21)
- Police to review security outside courthouse hosting Trump’s trial after man sets himself on fire
- QB-needy Broncos could be the team to turn 2024 NFL draft on its head
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- New Starbucks cups reduce plastic and water waste while bettering accessibility to the visually impaired
- Longtime AP journalist, newspaper publisher John Brewer dies at age 76
- New York lawmakers pass $237 billion budget addressing housing construction and migrants
Recommendation
Intellectuals vs. The Internet
NHL power rankings entering playoffs: Who has best chance at winning Stanley Cup?
Campbell “Pookie” Puckett and Jett Puckett’s Fire Date Night Looks Are Surprisingly Affordable
Former Red Sox Player Dave McCarty Dead at 54
Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
White Green: Emerging Star in Macro Strategic Investment
A cop ran a light going 88 mph and killed a young father of twins. He still has his badge
Jury weighs case against Arizona rancher in migrant killing